Praying the
Lord’s Prayer, is it vain repetition? By
Jack Kettler
9 After this
manner therefore pray ye: Our Father which
art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. 10 Thy
kingdom come, thy will be done in earth, as
it is in heaven. 11 Give us this day our
daily bread. 12 And forgive us our debts, as
we forgive our debtors. 13 And lead us not
into temptation, but deliver us from evil:
For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and
the glory, forever. Amen. Matthew 6:9–13
One Lord’s Day I
posted this prayer at a social media site
with no comments and was given a verse from
Matthew as a reply. The person posting this
passage from Matthew thought that praying
the Lord’s Prayer and apparently even
posting it was vain repetition.
“But when ye
pray, use not vain repetitions, as the
heathen do: for they think that they shall
be heard for their much speaking.” (Matthew
6:7)
For those that
wonder, how could someone actually believe
such a thing? As a young Christian in the
1970’s “Jesus People” movement, I heard this
same question come up numerous times about
praying the Lord’s Prayer and vain
repetitions.
Let’s consider
this dubious injunction against the Lord’s
Prayer:
“But when ye
pray, use not vain repetitions, as the
heathen do: for they think that they shall
be heard for their much speaking.” (Matthew
6:7)
Introductory
comments:
Who is Jesus
talking about in this passage? Jesus tells
us by warning about heathen prayers in
Matthew 6:8. Jesus then gives us a biblical
prayer in Matthew 6:9-13. It is the height
of exegetical nonsense to say that Jesus
contradicts himself two verses later when
explicitly saying: “Pray then like this:” in
Matthew 6:9. O logic, whence hast thou gone?
A commentary
exposition will be helpful at this point.
From Gill's
Exposition of the Entire Bible:
But when ye pray,
use not vain repetitions, Saying the same
things over and over again,
as the Heathens
do, as the worshippers of Baal, from morning
till noon, 1 Kings 18:26. This our Lord
observes, to dissuade from such practices,
because the Gentiles, who were odious to the
Jews, used them, and the Jews were guilty of
the same; had they not, there would not have
been any need of such advice:
for they think
they shall be heard for their much speaking;
as did the Jews, who, under pretence of
“long prayers”, devoured widows' houses; and
with whom it is an axiom, that “everyone,
that multiplies prayer is heard” (h); and
whoever prolongs his prayer, his prayer does
not return empty; and he that is long in
prayer, his days are prolonged (i): and,
according to their canons, every day a man
ought to pray eighteen prayers. Moreover,
their prayer books abound in tautologies,
and in expressing the same things in
different words, and by a multiplicity of
them.
(h) T. Hieros.
Taaniot, fol. 67. 3.((i) Zohar in Exod. fol.
104. 4. (1)
Gill notes, the
heathen and their “vain repetitions, saying
the same things over and over again,” and
“long prayers.” Is the Lord’s Prayer, a long
prayer? It is 70 words. Also, does this
prayer say the same things over and over
again? Also, what is vain about the Lord’s
Prayer?
Get out the
Dictionary:
Vain:
excessively proud of or concerned
about one's own appearance, qualities,
achievements, etc.; conceited.
Repetition:
the action of repeating something
that has already been said or written.
If the Matthew
6:7 passage is a warning about the Lord’s
Prayer, the burden of proof is on the
individual making such an accusation to
prove it exegetically and through word
etymology.
From Vine's
Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words:
VAIN, IN VAIN,
VAINLY
A. Adjectives.
1. KENOS,
“empty,” with special reference to quality, is
translated “vain” (as an adjective) in Acts
4:25; 1 Cor. 15:10, 14 (twice); Eph. 5:6; Col.
2:8; Jas. 2:20; in the following the neuter, kenon,
follows the preposition eis, in,” and
denotes “in vain,” 2 Cor. 6:1; Gal. 2:2; Phil.
2:16 (twice); 1 Thess. 3:5. See EMPTY, B, where
the applications are enumerated.'
2. MATAIOS, “void of result,” is used of
(a) idolatrous practices, Acts 14:15, RV, “vain
things” (KJV, “vanities”); (b) the thoughts of
the wise, 1 Cor. 3:20; (c) faith, if Christ is
not risen, 1 Cor. 15:17; (d) questionings,
strifes, etc., Titus 3:9; (e) religion, with an
unbridled tongue, Jas. 1:26; (f) manner of life,
1 Pet. 1:18. For the contrast between No. 1 and
No. 2 see
EMPTY.
Note: For , Titus 1:10, see TALKERS (VAIN).
B. Verbs.
1. MATAIOO,
“to make vain, or foolish,” corresponding in
meaning to A, No. 2, occurs in Rom. 1:21,
“became
vain.”
2. KENOO, “to empty,” corresponding to
A, No. 1, is translated “should be in vain” in 2
Cor. 9:3, KJV. See EFFECT, EMPTY, VOID.
C. Adverbs.
Indicates that all
the NT occurrences of the Greek word under
consideration are mentioned under the heading or
sub-heading.
1. MATEN, properly the accusative case
of mate, “a fault, a folly,” signifies
“in vain, to no purpose,” Matt. 15:9; Mark
7:7.
2. DOREAN, the accusative of dorea,
“a gift,” is used adverbially, denoting (a)
“freely” (see FREE, D); (b) “uselessly,” “in
vain,” Gal. 2:21, AV (RV, “for nought”). See
CAUSE, A, under “without a cause.” 3. EIKE,
denotes (a) “without cause,” “vainly,” Col.
2:18; (b) “to no purpose,” “in vain,” Rom. 13:4;
Gal. 3:4 (twice); 4:11. See CAUSE, A, Note (1),
under “without a cause” (2)
Another
commentary exposition will be helpful.
From Calvin’s
Commentary:
7.
Use
not vain repetitions He reproves another
fault in prayer, a multiplicity of words.
There are two words used, but in the same
sense: for battologia
is “a superfluous and affected repetition,”
and polulogia
is “unmeaning talk.” Christ reproves the
folly of those who, with the view of
persuading and entreating God, pour out a
superfluity of words. This doctrine is not
inconsistent with the praises everywhere
bestowed in Scripture on earnestness in
prayer: for, when prayer is offered with
earnest feeling, the tongue does not go
before the heart. Besides, the grace of God
is not obtained by an unmeaning flow of
words; but, on the contrary, a devout heart
throws out its affections, like arrows, to
pierce heaven. At the same time, this
condemns the superstition of those who
entertain the belief, that they will secure
the favor of God by long murmurings. We find
Popery to be so deeply imbued with this
error, that it believes the efficacy of
prayer to lie chiefly in talkativeness. The
greater number of words that a man mutters,
the more diligently he is supposed to have
prayed. Long and tedious chanting also, as
if it were to soothe the ears of God,
continually resounds in their cathedrals. (3)
Calvin mentions
the heathen and their “long murmurings.” Can
the Lord’s Prayer be described as long
murmurings?
Additional
thoughts and repeated emphasis:
Again, take note
that Jesus is warning his disciples against
praying like the heathen in Matthew 6:7, 8.
Considering the warnings in these two
passages, is there anything in the Lord’s
Prayer that would be mindless, vain, or
repetitious in the prayer? Also, there is no
similarity with the Lord’s Prayer and
monkish chants.
If praying the
Lord’s Prayer, is vain repetition? What
about reading the Lord’s Prayer, would that
also be vain repetition? What about singing
or reading the prayers of David in the
Psalms?
For logical
emphasis, is Jesus in Matthew 6:7
contradicting himself when he says how to
pray in Matthew 6:9-13? Once more, O logic,
whence hast thou gone?
For context in a
proper understanding of Matthew 6:7, Jesus
goes on and says this: “Be not ye therefore
like unto them: for your Father knoweth what
things ye have need of, before ye ask him.”
(Matthew 6:8)
Again, Jesus is
waning “Be not ye therefore like unto them…”
Like who? The heathen! It is obvious
from the context that Jesus is talking about
the heathen.
In introducing
the Prayer, Jesus says: “AFTER THIS MANNER
THEREFORE PRAY YE: Our Father which art in
heaven, Hallowed be thy name.” (Matthew 6:9)
(capitalization emphasis mine)
Jesus instructs
his disciples, “After this manner therefore
pray ye…” It seems preposterous that Jesus
would forbid something, like to not “use not
vain repetitions, as the heathen do” and two
passages later tell the disciples to pray a
vain repetitious prayer like He had just
forbidden.
Trying to argue
for something like this is an example of
etymological and false analogy fallacies.
Scripture is the best interpreter of
Scripture. The Lord’s prayer is an example
how to pray, not an example of a heathen
prayer. To say otherwise, is pitting
Scripture against Scripture.
Is there another
way of looking at this prayer rather than
praying it literally?
The Lord’s
Prayer, is it a model of how to pray, not
the way you should actually pray?
If this is true
about the prayer being a model, the burden
of proof is on the those advocating this
approach. This would need to be proven
exegetically since there is nothing in the
words of Jesus in Matthew saying the prayer
is just a model. That the idea that the
prayer is only a model is not explicit in
the text. It is possible that it could be
deduced, but this would have to be
demonstrated.
First, Jesus does
not tell His disciples, that this prayer is
a model for private prayers. Instead, He
introduces the prayer; “After this manner
therefore pray.” The conclusion is that we
are to pray using the same words that Christ
used.
Second, the
Lord’s prayer is primarily for corporate
use. The prayer starts with “Our Father,”
which is corporate, not private like “my
father.” In the prayer, the following
petitions are corporate: “Give us; forgive
us; against us; lead us; deliver us.” These
plural corporate expressions are why
churches use this prayer in public worship.
The regulatory principle* of worship would
further stipulate, that the prayer be used
repeating the exact words of Christ.
Regarding
personnel prayers, it certainly would be
helpful to use Lord's Prayer as a model for
prayers. As a model prayer, the various
petitions could be expanded upon during
private prayers.
Additional
information on the Lord’s Prayer:
In the Didache
one of the earliest doctrinal treatise in
the Early Church, we read:
“And do not
pray like the hypocrites, but as the Lord
commanded in his gospel, pray in this
manner: Our Father in heaven, hallowed be
your name. Your kingdom come; your will be
done, as in heaven, so also on earth. Give
us today our bread for the day. And forgive
us our debt, as we also forgive our debtors.
And lead us not into temptation, but deliver
us from the evil one, for yours is the power
and the glory forever…” (Didache 8:2–3)
The Lord’s
Prayer is important in Reformed and
Presbyterian worship:
Both the Larger
and Shorter Catechisms contain an exposition
of the Lord’s Prayer. The Lord’s Prayer is
particularly useful, they state, as “the
special rule of direction” that Jesus taught
his disciples “to direct us in the duty of
prayer.” (LC 186; SC 99)
In Conclusion:
We live in an age
of inexcusable evangelical ignorance of
theology. This is tragic, since theology
proper leads to the magnification of God’s
glory. We should strive for good precise
theology that magnifies the glorious grace
of God.
In
concluding, Calvin stresses the importance
of the Lord’s Prayer:
48. The
Lord’s prayer as a binding rule
“We have
everything we ought, or are able to seek of
God, set forth in this form and, as it were,
rule handed down by our best master, Christ,
whom the Father has appointed our teacher
and to whom alone he would have us harken,
and this prayer is in all respects so
perfect that any extraneous or alien thing
added to it is impious and unworthy to be
approved by God. For in this summary he has
set forth what is worthy of him, acceptable
to him, necessary for us – in effect, what
he would willingly grant. For this
reason, those who dare go farther and ask
anything from God beyond this: first wish
to add to God’s wisdom from their own,
which cannot happen without insane
blasphemy….”
(4)
“The whole Word of God is of
use to direct us in prayer, but the special
rule of direction is that form of prayer which
Christ taught His disciples, commonly called
The Lord’s Prayer” (The Westminster Shorter
Catechism).
“But grow in
grace, and in the knowledge of our Lord and
Savior Jesus Christ. To him be glory both
now and forever. Amen.” (2 Peter 3:18)
“Not by works
of righteousness which we have done, but
according to his mercy he saved us, by the
washing of regeneration, and renewing of the
Holy Ghost.” (Titus 3:5)
“To God only
wise, be glory through Jesus Christ forever.
Amen.” (Romans 16:27) and “heirs according
to the promise.” (Galatians 3:28, 29)
Notes:
John
Gill, Exposition
of the Old and New Testaments, Matthew, 9 Volumes, (Grace Works,
Multi-Media Labs, 2011), p. 151.
W. E. Vine, An
Expository Dictionary of New Testament
Words, (Iowa Falls, Iowa, Riverside
Book and Bible House), p. 1193.
John
Calvin, Calvin's
Commentaries, Volume XVI, (Grand Rapids,
Michigan, Baker Book House Reprinted
1979), p. 313.
John
Calvin, Institutes
of the Christian Religion, Book III, (Philadelphia, PA,
Westminster Press), p. 916.
Mr. Kettler has
previously published articles in the Chalcedon
Report and Contra Mundum. He
and his wife Marea attend the Westminster,
CO, RPCNA Church. Mr. Kettler is the author
of the book defending the Reformed Faith
against attacks. Available at:
www.TheReligionThatStartedInAHat.com
For more Study
Many great
Expositions of the Lord’s Prayer. Both
print and audio at: https://reformedbooksonline.com/topics/topics-by-subject/prayer/expositions-of-the-lords-prayer/
Westminster
Statements and the Heidelberg Catechism on
the Lords’ Prayer http://chrisbrauns.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Westminster-Confessions-and-Heidelberg-Catechism-on-the-Lords-Prayer1.pdf
Books:
The Lord's
Prayer by
Thomas
Watson, Publisher, Banner of Truth Trust
The Lord’s
Prayer: An Exposition,
John Calvin, Institutes of the Christian
Religion, Book III, pp. 897-917.
* The
Regulative principle of worship in Christian
theology teaches that the public worship of
God should include those and only those
elements that are instituted, commanded, or
appointed by command or example in the
Bible. In other words, it is the belief that
God institutes in Scripture whatever he
requires for worship in the Church, and
everything else should be avoided.