The Infralapsarian Supralapsarian Debate                                                   By Jack Kettler

 

Introduction:

 

The infralapsarian and supralapsarian debate, a significant theological discussion within the framework of Reformed theology, is a complex and intellectually stimulating conundrum. It specifically concerns the logical order of God's decrees in relation to the fall of humanity. Infralapsarians, also known as sublapsarians, argue that God's decree of election and reprobation occurred subsequent to the fall, while supralapsarians, also known as supralapsarians, posit that these decrees preceded the fall. This debate, with its implications for understanding God's sovereignty, human responsibility, and the nature of the fall itself, has been a subject of intense debate among scholars and theologians for centuries, providing a rich intellectual challenge and connecting us to a tradition of deep theological inquiry.

 

Infralapsarianism:

 

Infralapsarianism, a theological position within the Reformed tradition, posits that God's decree of election and reprobation occurred subsequent to the fall. This view holds that God first decreed to create the world and to permit the, and then in response to the fall, He determined to elect some to salvation and to leave others in their sin.

 

Scriptural support for this position can be found in passages that suggest a temporal sequence in God's decrees. For instance, Romans 9:22-23 states, “What if God, desiring to show his wrath and to make known his power, has endured with much patience vessels of wrath prepared for destruction, in order to make known the riches of his glory for vessels of mercy, which he has prepared beforehand for.” This passage suggests a sequence of events, with God first preparing vessels of wrath for destruction (a response to the fall) and then preparing vessels of mercy.

 

Additionally, 1 Peter 1:20 states, “He was foreknown before the foundation of the world but was made manifest in the last times for the sake of you.” This verse indicates that Christ was foreknown before the world's creation, implying that God's plan of salvation was formulated in response to the fall.

 

In summary, infralapsarianism argues that God's decrees of election and reprobation were a response to the fall, a view supported by a temporal reading of certain biblical passages.

 

Supralapsarianism:

 

Supralapsarianism, another theological position within the Reformed tradition, argues that God's decree of election and reprobation preceded the fall. This view holds that God first determined to elect some to salvation and to reprobate others, and then He decreed to create the world and to permit the fall as a means to these ends.

 

Scriptural support for this position can be found in passages that suggest a logical, rather than temporal, sequence in God's decrees. For instance, Ephesians 1:4 states, “He chose us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and blameless before him.” This verse suggests that God's choice of the elect occurred before the world's creation, implying a supralapsarian order of decrees.

 

Additionally, Romans 9:11-13 states, “Though they were not yet born and had done nothing either good or bad—so that God's purpose of election might continue, not because of works but because of him who calls— she was told, 'The older will serve the younger.' As it is written, 'Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated.'” This passage suggests that God's election of Jacob and reprobation of Esau occurred before their births, implying a supralapsarian order of decrees.

 

In summary, supralapsarianism argues that God's decrees of election and reprobation were logically before the fall, a view supported by a logical reading of certain biblical passages.

 

Adherents of infralapsarianism:

 

1.      John Calvin (1509-1564): Although his writings do not explicitly address the infralapsarian-supralapsarian debate, many scholars interpret his views as leaning towards infralapsarianism.

2.      Theodore Beza (1519-1605): A student of Calvin and a prominent theologian in his own right, Beza is often considered an infralapsarian.

3.      Francis Turretin (1623-1687): A Swiss-Italian Reformed theologian, Turretin is known for his infralapsarian views, which he articulated in his influential work, "Institutes of Elenctic Theology."

4.      Herman Witsius (1636-1708): A Dutch theologian, Witsius is another notable infralapsarian known for his work "The Economy of the Covenants Between God and Man."

5.      Charles Hodge (1797-1878): An American Presbyterian theologian, Hodge is often cited as an infralapsarian, particularly for his views on the order of God's decrees.

 

These theologians represent a range of perspectives within the Reformed tradition, all of whom contributed significantly to the development of infralapsarian thought.

 

Ahherents  of supralapsarianism:

 

1.      Jerome Zanchius (1516-1590): An Italian-born Reformed theologian, Zanchius is often considered a supralapsarian.

2.      William Perkins (1558-1602): An English clergyman and theologian, Perkins is known for his supralapsarian views, which he articulated in his work "A Golden Chain."

3.      Franciscus Gomarus (1563-1641): A Dutch theologian and opponent of Arminius, Gomarus is another notable supralapsarian.

4.      Johannes Cocceius (1603-1669): A Dutch theologian, Cocceius is known for his supralapsarian views, which he articulated in his work "Summa Theologiae."

 

These theologians represent a range of perspectives within the Reformed tradition, all of whom contributed significantly to the development of supralapsarian thought.

 

Are the Reformed Confessions, such as the Belgic and Westminster Confessions, infralapsarian or supralapsarian?

 

The Reformed Confessions, such as the Belgic and Westminster Confessions, are generally considered to be infralapsarian in their understanding of the decrees of God. Infralapsarianism, derived from the Latin phrase “infralapsarian,” meaning “below the fall,” holds that the order of God's decrees is as follows:

 

1.      God decrees to create the world and humanity.

2.      God decrees to permit the fall of humanity into sin.

3.      God decrees to elect some individuals to salvation and pass over others, leaving them in their fallen state.

4.      God decrees to provide salvation through the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ.

5.      God decrees to apply salvation to the elect through the work of the Holy Spirit.

 

Supralapsarianism, on the other hand, holds that the order of God's decrees is as follows:

 

1.      God decrees to elect some individuals to salvation and pass over others.

2.      God decrees to create the world and humanity.

3.      God decrees to permit the fall of humanity into sin.

4.      God decrees to provide salvation through the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ.

5.      God decrees to apply salvation to the elect through the work of the Holy Spirit.

 

The distinction between infralapsarianism and supralapsarianism lies in the order of God's decrees regarding election and the fall. While both views affirm God's sovereignty in salvation, they differ in their understanding of the logical order of God's decrees.

 

Conclusion:

 

The infralapsarian and supralapsarian debate, while historically significant in Reformed theological circles, has seen a decline in prominence in contemporary theological discourse. This shift reflects broader changes in theological priorities and methodologies, with many theologians today focusing on other areas of inquiry, such as the nature of God, Christology, and theodicy. However, the debate remains relevant as it touches on fundamental questions about the nature of God's sovereignty and human responsibility and how these relate to the problem of evil. Understanding these positions can provide insights into how different theological traditions approach these complex issues and can inform broader discussions about the nature of God and theodicy.

 

The above study was Groked and perfected with Grammarly AI.

 

“Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.” (2 Timothy 2:15)

 

Mr. Kettler is a respected author who has previously published articles in the Chalcedon Report and Contra Mundum. He and his wife, Marea, are active Westminster, CO, RPCNA Church members. Mr. Kettler's extensive work includes 18 books defending the Reformed Faith, which are available for order online at Amazon.