Can Christians be involved in the arts and politics?                                        By Jack Kettler

 

The question of whether Christians can be involved in the arts can be explored from both theological and historical perspectives, with a foundation in biblical principles.

 

Theological Justification:

 

1.      Creation and Creativity: The Bible begins with the act of creation by God, as described in Genesis 1:1, "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth." This act of creation sets a precedent for creativity being inherently part of the divine image in which humans are made (Genesis 1:27). If humans are made in the image of a creative God, then artistic expression can be seen as a reflection of this divine attribute. Psalm 139:14 further emphasizes the beauty of creation, suggesting an appreciation for aesthetics and beauty, which the arts often seek to express.

 

2.      Artistic Skills in the Construction of the Tabernacle: Exodus 31:1-5 describes how Bezalel was filled with the Spirit of God in wisdom, understanding, knowledge, and all manner of workmanship to devise artistic works in gold, silver, and bronze. This passage indicates that God not only endorses but divinely gifts individuals with artistic talents for sacred purposes, directly linking art with divine service.

 

3.      Praise and Worship: Psalms, often considered poetry, are a form of art used in worship. The Psalms are filled with expressions of emotion, beauty, and truth, which are fundamental to artistic expression.

 

4.      Parables and Storytelling: Jesus Christ used parables, which can be viewed as an art form of storytelling, to convey spiritual truths (Matthew 13). This use of narrative arts by Jesus demonstrates that storytelling, a key component of many art forms, can be a vehicle for teaching, moral reflection, and spiritual growth.

 

Historical Context:

 

·         Throughout history, Christian art has played a significant role in the church, from the stained glass windows of medieval cathedrals to Western Christianity. These artistic expressions have not only served aesthetic purposes but have been instrumental in teaching the faith to the illiterate, conveying theological concepts, and fostering communal identity.

 

Defensive Against Criticism:

 

·         Some might argue that involvement in the arts could lead to idolatry or distraction from spiritual matters. However, this concern can be addressed by ensuring that artistic endeavors are directed towards glorifying God, educating the community about faith, or reflecting on the human condition in light of biblical truths. Colossians 3:17 advises, "And whatever you do in word or deed, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God the Father through Him." This suggests that all activities, including arts, can be sanctified when performed with the right intention.

 

In conclusion:

 

From a biblical standpoint, Christians can and are encouraged to participate in the arts as part of their worship, service, and reflection of God’s creative image. The arts can be a profound means of expressing faith, teaching doctrine, and engaging with the broader culture in a manner consistent with Christian values.

 

Title: Christian Participation in Politics: A Biblical Examination

 

Introduction:

 

The question of whether Christians can engage in politics is both historically relevant and theologically complex. This discussion will explore the biblical foundations that either support or challenge Christian involvement in political spheres.

 

Biblical Considerations:

 

1.      Render Unto Caesar (Mark 12:17, Matthew 22:21):

 

·         Jesus' response to the Pharisees regarding taxes, "Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's," suggests a level of engagement with secular governance. This statement acknowledges the existence and legitimacy of political authority, implicitly sanctioning involvement to some degree.

 

2.      Paul's Instruction to Authorities (Romans 13:1-7):

 

·         Paul explicitly instructs Christians to submit to governing authorities, which are described as "instituted by God." This text forms a primary argument for Christian political involvement, suggesting that by participating in politics, Christians can influence these God-ordained structures for good.

 

3.      Leadership and Wisdom (Proverbs 8:15-16):

 

·         Proverbs states, "By me [wisdom] kings reign, and rulers decree what is just." Here, wisdom, personified, claims authority over rulers, implying that Christians, who should seek wisdom, have a role in governance to ensure justice.

 

4.      Prophetic Roles in Society (Amos 5:24):

 

·         The prophet Amos calls for justice to "roll down like waters," indicating a prophetic duty to speak about societal and political issues. This suggests not just passive acceptance but active engagement in advocating for justice.

 

5.      Daniel and Joseph: Political Figures in the Bible:

 

·         Both Daniel and Joseph were placed in high political offices in foreign governments. Their roles involved navigating political landscapes to serve God's purposes, demonstrating that political involvement can be part of a divine mission.

 

Counterarguments:

 

1.      Separation from Worldly Systems:

 

·         Some interpretations of scriptures like 2 Corinthians 6:17 ("Come out from them and be separate") might suggest a withdrawal from worldly systems including politics. However, this passage primarily addresses moral and spiritual separation rather than physical or societal disengagement.

 

2.      Temptation of Power:

 

·         The Bible warns of the corrupting influence of power (1 Samuel 8:10-22), which might lead some to argue against Christians engaging in politics where such temptations are rife. Yet, this can also be seen as a call for vigilance rather than abstention.

 

A specific argument against involvement in politics or voting:

 

The country was not started as a Christian nation; therefore, a Christian should not vote or engage in politics.

 

The assertion that "the country was not started as a Christian nation; therefore, a Christian should not vote or engage in politics" can be refuted on both biblical and logical grounds as follows:

 

Biblical Refutation:

 

1.      Christian Civic Responsibility:

 

·         Scriptures advocate for the engagement of Christians in civic duties. Romans 13:1-7 explicitly states the need to submit to governing authorities, which implies active participation in the political system to ensure these authorities are just and God-fearing. This passage does not suggest withdrawal from political involvement but rather engagement to promote good governance.

 

·         1 Timothy 2:1-2 instructs believers to pray for those in authority so that we may live peaceful and quiet lives in all godliness and holiness. This directive inherently involves understanding and influencing the political landscape to foster an environment conducive to Christian living.

 

·         Jesus' command to "render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's" (Mark 12:17) implies a dual responsibility where Christians are to be involved in secular affairs while maintaining spiritual fidelity.

 

2.      Biblical Examples of Political Engagement:

 

·         The prophet Daniel's involvement in the Babylonian and Persian courts (Daniel chapters 1-6) illustrates how a faithful servant of God can engage in politics without compromising his faith, thereby serving as a model for Christian political involvement.

 

·         Joseph in Egypt (Genesis 41-50) used his administrative role to enact policies that saved many lives, demonstrating that political power can be used for moral and beneficial ends.

 

Logical Refutation:

 

1.      Historical Context vs. Modern Application:

 

·         Even if one were to argue that the country was not founded explicitly as a Christian nation, this does not logically preclude Christian participation in modern governance. The nature and role of a nation can evolve, and Christians have the responsibility to contribute to this development in line with their values and ethics.

 

2.      Separation of Church and State:

 

·         The concept of separation of church and state in the U.S. context ensures that the government does not establish religion, but it does not bar individuals from bringing their religious convictions into the public square or influencing policy according to those convictions. Therefore, Christians are free to engage in politics to reflect their faith within the bounds of secular law.

 

3.      Moral Influence in Governance:

 

·         Christians have historically influenced laws and societal norms towards justice, peace, and human dignity based on Judeo-Christian ethics. Abstaining from politics would relinquish this influence, potentially leading to policies contrary to Christian teachings on human values, justice, and compassion.

 

4.      Voting as Moral Action:

 

·         Voting is an act of moral agency where Christians can express their values in the public sphere. Not voting would be to abdicate this responsibility, which contradicts the Christian call to be "salt and light" in the world (Matthew 5:13-16), influencing it positively.

 

 

The statement “The country was not started as a Christian nation; therefore, a Christian should not vote or engage in politics” contains a logical fallacy known as non sequitur (Latin for "it does not follow"). Here's how:

 

Premise: "The country was not started as a Christian nation."

Conclusion: "Therefore, a Christian should not vote or engage in politics."

 

The fallacy lies in the fact that the conclusion does not logically follow from the premise. Here's why:

 

1.      Irrelevance of Historical Foundation to Current Participation: The historical foundation of a country, whether it was established with or without religious intent, does not directly dictate the appropriateness of religious individuals participating in its political processes. The premise might be about the origins or initial intent of the nation, but this does not inherently relate to the rights or duties of individuals based on their religious beliefs today.

 

2.      Rights and Duties: Modern democratic societies generally uphold the right of all citizens, regardless of religion, to participate in political processes like voting or engaging in politics. The premise does not address whether the country's founders intended to exclude Christians from political participation; it only states the country's founding wasn't explicitly Christian. This does not logically lead to a conclusion about the participation of Christians in current political activities.

 

3.      Assumption of Exclusivity: The conclusion assumes that only nations founded with explicit Christian principles should allow Christian political involvement, which is an arbitrary and unfounded restriction on personal freedoms and civic duties. This assumption overlooks the principle of separation of church and state, where individuals can hold and act upon their religious beliefs while participating in secular governance.

 

4.      Misconception About Civic Duty: Voting and political engagement are seen as civic duties or rights in many democratic systems, not contingent on the religious nature of the state's founding. The argument fails to recognize that Christian values might include civic participation as a form of stewardship or service to the community.

 

In summary, the conclusion does not logically follow from the premise because a country's historical religious identity (or lack thereof) does not dictate individuals' political participation rights or duties based on their current religious beliefs. This fallacy is a clear example of a non sequitur, where the connection between the premise and conclusion is missing or illogical.

 

In conclusion:

 

The assertion that Christians should not engage in politics due to the non-Christian founding of a nation is neither supported by biblical texts advocating civic involvement nor by logical reasoning concerning contemporary societal roles and influences. Instead, both scripture and logic suggest Christians should actively participate in political processes to uphold and promote Christian values.

 

In Summary:

 

Biblically, there is a strong foundation for Christian involvement in politics. The mandates to submit to, respect, and even influence political authorities for the sake of justice and righteousness are clear. However, this involvement must be approached with discernment, aiming not at personal gain or the accumulation of power but at the service of God's will for human society. The biblical narrative supports Christians not only participating but actively shaping political landscapes in accordance with divine principles of justice, mercy, and humility.

 

While the Bible does not provide a comprehensive political theory, it offers principles that can guide Christian engagement in politics. This involvement should be reflective, prayerful, and focused on embodying the teachings of Christ and the prophets in the public square.

 

The above study was Groked, under the direction of Jack Kettler, and perfected using Grammarly AI.

 

“Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.” (2 Timothy 2:15)

 

Mr. Kettler is an author who has previously published articles in the Chalcedon Report and Contra Mundum. He and his wife, Marea, are active Westminster, CO, RPCNA Church members. Mr. Kettler’s extensive work includes 18 books defending the Reformed Faith, which are available for order online at Amazon.